<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bond Street? No. Hatton Garden? Yes.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:30:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>We actually just turned the programme off. We felt that the presenter was doing more harm to her cause than good and that she was ruining her credibility as a journalist.

That has to be the worst documentaries I&#039;ve seen in a long time. It was supposed to be pro-chav, but the chick made me dislike them, if anything, and I had previously had no opinion at all. :P
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We actually just turned the programme off. We felt that the presenter was doing more harm to her cause than good and that she was ruining her credibility as a journalist.</p>
<p>That has to be the worst documentaries I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. It was supposed to be pro-chav, but the chick made me dislike them, if anything, and I had previously had no opinion at all. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfc</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>pfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Sky 1 at 9.00pm

now, how did you know I&#039;d know that???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sky 1 at 9.00pm</p>
<p>now, how did you know I&#8217;d know that???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just the London Tiffany&#039;s.

Incidentally, there was an interesting blurb in The Economist recently about Tiffany&#039;s and how the brand had been damaged by the recent surge in popularity of the downmarket silver jewelry they&#039;ve been selling. It seems that snobby rich people don&#039;t feel the brand is prestigious enough now that everyone and his brother has a &#039;Return to Tiffany&#039; necklace and bracelet. Which is perhaps part of the reason we weren&#039;t treated with respect? The lady might have thought we should be upstairs with the other less posh people? If that&#039;s the case, it&#039;s bullshit. :)

Further to &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;, there&#039;s a show on chavs coming up on some channel that looks really interesting. I don&#039;t remember the channel now, though. Doh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just the London Tiffany&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Incidentally, there was an interesting blurb in The Economist recently about Tiffany&#8217;s and how the brand had been damaged by the recent surge in popularity of the downmarket silver jewelry they&#8217;ve been selling. It seems that snobby rich people don&#8217;t feel the brand is prestigious enough now that everyone and his brother has a &#8216;Return to Tiffany&#8217; necklace and bracelet. Which is perhaps part of the reason we weren&#8217;t treated with respect? The lady might have thought we should be upstairs with the other less posh people? If that&#8217;s the case, it&#8217;s bullshit. :)</p>
<p>Further to <em>that</em>, there&#8217;s a show on chavs coming up on some channel that looks really interesting. I don&#8217;t remember the channel now, though. Doh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>True. We bought ours in Taipei though the store has now moved to the mall in the world&#039;s tallest building Taipei 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. We bought ours in Taipei though the store has now moved to the mall in the world&#8217;s tallest building Taipei 101.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I do admit it is possible. Or maybe they&#039;re just nicer to people who are buying wedding bands there (mine is from Tiffany&#039;s too!). Or maybe it was the chick that was &#039;helping&#039; me.

I may well have been mistaken for a tourist, as I was walking around in jeans and a tee-shirt and do have that telling American accent. Though... Tiffany&#039;s is an American company so they should be nice regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do admit it is possible. Or maybe they&#8217;re just nicer to people who are buying wedding bands there (mine is from Tiffany&#8217;s too!). Or maybe it was the chick that was &#8216;helping&#8217; me.</p>
<p>I may well have been mistaken for a tourist, as I was walking around in jeans and a tee-shirt and do have that telling American accent. Though&#8230; Tiffany&#8217;s is an American company so they should be nice regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london.metblogs.com/2005/02/20/bond-street-no-hatton-garden-yes/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d beg to differ on Tiffany&#039;s where they were ever so helpful in getting my wedding band resized at no fee, somehting to do with it being the first time. Maybe the staff were having a bad day, or worse still thought you were a tourist! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d beg to differ on Tiffany&#8217;s where they were ever so helpful in getting my wedding band resized at no fee, somehting to do with it being the first time. Maybe the staff were having a bad day, or worse still thought you were a tourist! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
